|
|
Buly,
When do you think that you're going to fly without the
turbo ??
I'm waiting to hear a flight report.
Steve Brooks
--- Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Thanks Richard. Now I have to learn to fly that
thing without making a merry widow of my wife :)
Last evening, after removing the turbo and making
bunch of improvements including IVO electric 68" prop, I
loaded the minister of finance (she ordered me ) and went to make three
high speed taxis with the new prop. What a kick in the back! These
props make big difference on take off by allowing you to develop
high rpm from the start. Since I ordered this prop for my turbo
installation, I'm a bit low on the rpm. Will try it by converting the same
prop (68" with pitch 45-105 range) to two blade. My prop
calculator http:// www.hoverhawk.com/propspd.html tells me for best
thrust I must spin the engine at least to 6500 - 7000 rpm. I'm about
1000 rpm short right now. I was surprised to see my manifold
pressure go past 30". i did not understand why my TAS stays at 18 when the
plane is not moving, but goes up with the forward speed? I was
expecting to see it at zero?.
Buly
On Jun 28, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Richard Sohn wrote:
> Hi Buly and Ernest,
>
> you guy's can only be proud with your plan-built
projects. You are > way ahead of us kit builders as far as dedication
is concerned in > addition of everything else. I have watched
several Easy builders > over the years, and at my visit to Ernest last
Christmas, I > realized again how much difference there is
between kit and plan > when Ernest explained to me how he managed to
manufacture SS > channel because it could not bought anywhere. I
think plan-builders > are the creme of the experimenters community.
> FWIW.
>
> Richard Sohn
> N-2071U
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|
|