Posted for Sky2high@aol.com:

 
 In a message dated 11/14/2006 11:49:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,
 rtitsworth@mindspring.com writes:
 

 Perhaps this is  something that NAFI could/should attempt.    Of course, we
 need  to be careful here, if the Feds come to the conclusion that x hrs of
 re-current training results in x% reduction in GA accidents, we might find
 ourselves with additional FARs.  Luckily  they typically move slowly and have
 plenty of other stuff to worry about or…  perhaps that would be a good
thing???
<<<
 
 
 Rick,
 
 Experimental aircraft have already seen a year to year reduction in
 accidents - thus the FAA, only dealing with the forests, will not do anything
 
 untoward.  The insurance companies, paying for lost trees, will set the
 requirements
 for operation of frequently falling fauna and make "errant"  owner/pilots pay
 thru the nasal passages for not meeting their minima.
 
 Grayhawk