From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair down in Georgia - Training
To: lml
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:06:21 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1565953@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <c43.878e39a.328b8b14@aol.com>
References: <c43.878e39a.328b8b14@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="utf-8";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Sky2high@aol.com:

  
  In a message dated 11/14/2006 11:49:08 A.M. Central Standard Time,
  rtitsworth@mindspring.com writes:
  

>>>
  Perhaps this is  something that NAFI could/should attempt.    Of course, we
  need  to be careful here, if the Feds come to the conclusion that x hrs of
  re-current training results in x% reduction in GA accidents, we might find
  ourselves with additional FARs.  Luckily  they typically move slowly and 
have
  plenty of other stuff to worry about or…  perhaps that would be a good
thing???
<<<
  
  
  Rick,
  
  Experimental aircraft have already seen a year to year reduction in
  accidents - thus the FAA, only dealing with the forests, will not do 
anything
  
  untoward.  The insurance companies, paying for lost trees, will set the
  requirements
  for operation of frequently falling fauna and make "errant"  owner/pilots 
pay
  thru the nasal passages for not meeting their minima.
  
  Grayhawk