Check;;
N655HC at;; www.faa.gov
as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to
set up meeting. David R. Cook RV6A Rotary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft"
<flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!
I just checked several other FAA records
for known rotary engines. They were all registered as
“reciprocating” as well.
I now know what to do!
Back and forth and round and round mean
the same thing in governmentspeak!
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010
6:04 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re:
"Wankel" is unacceptable!
Actually looks like I was forced to chose
reciprocating:
http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl
Finn
On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:
I made application the other day to
register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today in the mail a
request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Ownership.
“The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, etc.”
“The type ‘wankel’ is
unknown and is unacceptable.”
Since the engine is none of the above,
what did you guys use when you registered your planes??? I am at a
loss as to what would be the correct type???
Bill B