Check;;
N655HC at;;
www.faa.gov as you will see we
do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up
meeting. David R. Cook RV6A Rotary.
----- Original Message
-----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <
bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
To:
"Rotary motors in aircraft" <
flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent:
Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is
unacceptable!
I just checked
several other FAA records for known rotary engines. They were all
registered as “reciprocating” as well.
I now know what to
do!
Back and forth and
round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak!
Bill
B
From: Rotary motors
in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04
PM
To: Rotary motors in
aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary]
Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!
Actually looks like I was forced to chose
reciprocating:
http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl
Finn
On
11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:
I made application
the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today
in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of
Ownership. “The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller,
etc.”
“The type ‘wankel’ is
unknown and is unacceptable.”
Since the engine is
none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your
planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the correct
type???
Bill
B