X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with SMTP id 4553605 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:15:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.75; envelope-from=downing.j@sbcglobal.net Received: from [98.139.91.64] by nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 13:14:51 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.25] by tm4.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 13:14:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1025.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Nov 2010 13:14:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 403899.96513.bm@omp1025.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 62439 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2010 13:14:50 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=6djU89dihQWh8AohAbdtKXEwmhcqfhKkp7Dk3vFDpex7XOgLO16TRcDnbzbE9E5uj/Pri8RarNaejPbli4TKc8ac7GNYioOXpz6vzLBrw6zNjnIBX921Ay9/zMv7LNhIgqjPAfy0/2t/663rOcd5kmzBc9WVNnumngU0QCcfcwU= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1288790090; bh=uCjzMyXunHKJURrgvoQYZVwl+7HU8w27Z4ZcDaia64Y=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=hwitzA+b00DlFUMEV8dJOANRJAAjjs7N9eKYQ26a6E2BHrkSwlu3BUbsHQUYFeTFEbFV5RVlPrC3RpTEcBX8OtaHtCUkkXwfOy9g40LAGUOgQbrz35HEZHTAk2AIP9jzyipiAPdEuBgKtQ3eZf1//SVA0bP6NH2uZo8PqrxpxvE= Received: from JohnPC (downing.j@69.209.118.37 with login) by smtp125.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 Nov 2010 06:14:50 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: 4Ss7WYSswBAR3ULsDHPw5yIFKkoakpn6PCJcwuPp3izwMVSl X-YMail-OSG: TKRMgAkVM1me0io8Td9BN68Zei23Ro6KHjz0k3qVA5XjmI9 5zAutjJ4iRoDvi6Y74HwxacUxmMBw8QHOKK19GCDJ6GjpUMaxgowOFD9Jrrw 4bXwUXFs2aSw.5hyvtDMXDenoXWbSAIEQOcO5Hj7iI645Zj40FUgtVlYpjze 9.8caCTR5XVAU9z9E9wmb1IZAylMxAqzynwwHW2Wk8m36mtySHNzO2nekpHO IHhDW5cPkrUb5tvN44a0t1s4EIt9VIoo8nvTO4V2KjGfiFH2kE9srcySkHbS 6tJHhNA24IXDb.nBOl29SX79FEoc- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4A2CAF205C394EE59EC9CBBEC7FF1746@JohnPC> From: To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:14:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0023_01CB7B37.95302810" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18263 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01CB7B37.95302810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, mine is listed as Mazda, 13B, also listed on database on = landings.com. JohnD...N36JX ----- Original Message -----=20 From: hoursaway1@comcast.net=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:28 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Check;; N655HC at;; www.faa.gov as you will see we do not have = airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up meeting. David R. = Cook RV6A Rotary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines. = They were all registered as =E2=80=9Creciprocating=E2=80=9D as well. I now know what to do! Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in = governmentspeak! Bill B -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating: = http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-= number-lookup/n993fl Finn On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:=20 I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I = just got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine = on the Affidavit of Ownership. =E2=80=9CThe type shall be either = reciprocating, turbopropeller, etc.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=9CThe type =E2=80=98wankel=E2=80=99 is unknown and is = unacceptable.=E2=80=9D Since the engine is none of the above, what did you guys use when you = registered your planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the = correct type??? Bill B ------=_NextPart_000_0023_01CB7B37.95302810 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
David, mine is listed as Mazda, 13B, = also listed on=20 database on landings.com.  JohnD...N36JX
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 hoursaway1@comcast.net =
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, = 2010 11:28=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = "Wankel" is=20 unacceptable!

Check;; =20 N655HC   at;;  www.faa.gov    as you = will see we=20 do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up=20 meeting.  David R. Cook  RV6A Rotary.
----- Original = Message=20 -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>=
To:=20 "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent:=20 Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = "Wankel" is=20 unacceptable!

I just = checked=20 several other FAA records for known rotary engines.  They were = all=20 registered as =E2=80=9Creciprocating=E2=80=9D as = well.

I now know = what to=20 do!

 

Back and = forth and=20 round and round mean the same thing in = governmentspeak!

 

Bill=20 B

 

From: = Rotary motors=20 in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn = Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, = 2010 6:04=20 PM
To: Rotary = motors in=20 aircraft
Subject: = [FlyRotary]=20 Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 

Actually looks like I was forced to chose=20 reciprocating:

http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0= %3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl

Finn

On=20 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote:

I made = application=20 the other day to register my plane with the FAA.  I just got back = today=20 in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit = of=20 Ownership.  =E2=80=9CThe type shall be either reciprocating, = turbopropeller,=20 etc.=E2=80=9D

=E2=80=9CThe type =E2=80=98wankel=E2=80=99 is=20 unknown and is unacceptable.=E2=80=9D

 

Since the = engine is=20 none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your=20 planes???   I am at a loss as to what would be the correct=20 type???

 

Bill=20 B

 

------=_NextPart_000_0023_01CB7B37.95302810--