X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([204.127.217.103] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4553626 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:38:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.217.103; envelope-from=bbradburry@bellsouth.net Received: from desktop (adsl-85-148-241.mco.bellsouth.net[98.85.148.241]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20101103133747H030031n9re>; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:37:48 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [98.85.148.241] From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:37:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1C604AF53D054BA28C4B85089E667271@Desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB7B3A.C878F140" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Act7WTFSvEteI0ZVTjeSYe5qMy2UmgAAn+Mg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB7B3A.C878F140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit JohnD, Your Engine Manufacturer is listed as "Mazda", your Engine Model is listed as "13B". But your Type Engine is listed as "reciprocating". I wonder why this question has never come up before?? Bill B _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of downing.j@sbcglobal.net Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:15 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! David, mine is listed as Mazda, 13B, also listed on database on landings.com. JohnD...N36JX ----- Original Message ----- From: hoursaway1@comcast.net To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:28 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Check;; N655HC at;; www.faa.gov as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, have to set up meeting. David R. Cook RV6A Rotary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Bradburry" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! I just checked several other FAA records for known rotary engines. They were all registered as "reciprocating" as well. I now know what to do! Back and forth and round and round mean the same thing in governmentspeak! Bill B _____ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 6:04 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable! Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating: http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGjah0%3D/resources-n-num ber-lookup/n993fl Finn On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA. I just got back today in the mail a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of Ownership. "The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, etc." "The type 'wankel' is unknown and is unacceptable." Since the engine is none of the above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes??? I am at a loss as to what would be the correct type??? Bill B ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB7B3A.C878F140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

JohnD,

 

Your Engine Manufacturer is listed = as “Mazda”, your Engine Model is listed as = “13B”.

 

But your Type Engine is listed as = “reciprocating”.

 

I wonder why this question has = never come up before??

 

Bill B

 

From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of downing.j@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Wednesday, November = 03, 2010 9:15 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 

David, mine is listed as Mazda, 13B, also = listed on database on landings.com.  = JohnD...N36JX

----- Original Message ----- =

Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 11:28 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 

Check;;  N655HC   at;;  www.faa.gov    as you will see we do not have airworthyness cert. yet, we are ready, = have to set up meeting.  David R. Cook  RV6A Rotary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Bradburry" <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>=
To: "Rotary motors in = aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2010 9:09:37 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is = unacceptable!

I just checked several other FAA = records for known rotary engines.  They were all registered as “reciprocating” as well.

I now know what to = do!

 

Back and forth and round and round = mean the same thing in governmentspeak!

 

Bill B

 

From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Tuesday, November = 02, 2010 6:04 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "Wankel" is unacceptable!

 

Actually looks like I was forced to chose reciprocating:

http://avadaviator.com/index.php?item/listing/12lFGXGja= h0%3D/resources-n-number-lookup/n993fl

Finn

On 11/2/2010 5:48 PM, Bill Bradburry wrote: =

I made application the other day to register my plane with the FAA.  I just got back today in the mail = a request to clarify the type of engine on the Affidavit of = Ownership.  “The type shall be either reciprocating, turbopropeller, = etc.”

“The type = ‘wankel’ is unknown and is unacceptable.”

 

Since the engine is none of the = above, what did you guys use when you registered your planes???   I = am at a loss as to what would be the correct = type???

 

Bill B

 

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01CB7B3A.C878F140--