|
|
Hi Michael,
That's the orientation I used, except with about a 60 deg slant. As Ed
says, it was for space constraints. Outlet at the bottom, inlet at the
top. For the car installation, I'm going to try cutting the ends off
and getting two cores welded together to simplify the plumbing. On the
plane, I used AN16 fittings and had to make the spacing between the
cores equal to an AN16 "T" plus two AN16 couplers to make it work.
Bob W.
On Thu, 1 May 2008 19:10:28 -0500
"Michael Silvius" <silvius@gwi.net> wrote:
Geroge:
In the end I will likely angle them a bit but my primary concern is if it is
ok to install these radiators in the vertical orientation. I have the space
up and down to use them this way. The nose bowl I have seems to work well
with things set up that way.
Michael
----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 5:50 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: radiator orientation?
>
> > Anyonene see any issues of concern with instaling the radiators in the
> > vertical orientation as oposed to their normal orientation with the
inlets
> > and outlet on the top. These are evaporator cores from a JMC Jimmy-
Chevy
> > Blazer
> >
> > Michael in Maine
>
> Michael,
> The front adds significantly to the flat plate drag and anything you can
do
> to reduce that affects the total drag. Are you happy with the front width,
> could it be reduced with some angle on the rads?
> George ( down under)
>
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
> Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>
>
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
--
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com
3.8 Hours Total Time and holding
Cables for your rotary installation - http://roblinstores.com/cables/
|
|