Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #37951
From: <bmears9413@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:05:56 -0400
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Direct injection into the chamber after the intake port closed would be the nuts I would think...If you can do that. If thats the case you could port as you please without hurting your mpg.

Bob Mears


-----Original Message-----
From: wrjjrs@aol.com
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 9:41 am
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations

 
Bob, 
 The engine in a Toyota Prius has overlap. My point is that it is NOT the sole determination of economy. This isn't the biggest factor for efficiency. I believe managing charge contamination is important, sure but not the only factor. I think the new direct injection systems will work very well with the rotary. The point is that getting the engine to pump the most air at a given RPM is "THE WAY." 
Bill Jepson 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: bmears9413@aol.com 
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <>flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 5:54 am 
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: Different Rotary Port configurations 
 
 
And let me assure you, a P port will NOT get the same GPH. Theres a lot of fuel wasted with the P Port due to the overlap in timing. 
 
  
 
Bob Mears 
 
Supermarine Spitfire 
 
________________________________________________________________________ 
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. 
=0 
 
-- 
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ 
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html 

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster