Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #13824
From: rijakits <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: A First (and note to Perry)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:01:28 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:41 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: A First (and note to Perry)


"Perry Mick" <pjmick@mail.viclink.com> wrote:

"""
I've tried 4 times now to use a computerized dynamic balance
  system, but it won't converge on a solution. It always worked perfectly
with
  my direct-drive fan. So it mustn't like geared engines. I'm going to
trial-
  and-error it by moving a fender washer (weight) from one prop bolt to
the
  next and see if the vibration level readout increases or decreases, and
try
  to find a minimum.
"""

I'm curious, Perry, if a fender washer might not be overkill...  last guy
I
saw had a prop dynamically balanced it took a short #6 screw to get the
job
done.  Given the size of prop bolts and their associated fender washer
size,
aren't you concerned that will be _too much_ mass?  I'd think that much
weight
fladdling around off-center out there at 2000+ rpm would make matters
worse,
not better.  Like I said, just curious (and concerned).

My experience with these electronic balancers is:
a) if you can't get a consistent reading, something is out of spec, a loose
engine mount, worn bearing, off-center mounted/drilled/bored prop
b) balancer out of calibration

c) Generally it takes me about 5 runs to go from an initial run down to
about 0.02 to 0.05 IPS, if it takes more runs and values continue to jump
around "the clock", something is not right, a or b.

My 5cents,

Thomas J.


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster