Return-Path: Received: from frontend2.cwpanama.net ([201.225.225.168] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 566675 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:02:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.168; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend2.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with SMTP id 32031773 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:01:47 -0500 Message-ID: <022c01c4e199$f86c9cd0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: A First (and note to Perry) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 00:01:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2741.2600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2742.200 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marvin Kaye" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:41 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: A First (and note to Perry) > "Perry Mick" wrote: > > """ > I've tried 4 times now to use a computerized dynamic balance > system, but it won't converge on a solution. It always worked perfectly with > my direct-drive fan. So it mustn't like geared engines. I'm going to trial- > and-error it by moving a fender washer (weight) from one prop bolt to the > next and see if the vibration level readout increases or decreases, and try > to find a minimum. > """ > > I'm curious, Perry, if a fender washer might not be overkill... last guy I > saw had a prop dynamically balanced it took a short #6 screw to get the job > done. Given the size of prop bolts and their associated fender washer size, > aren't you concerned that will be _too much_ mass? I'd think that much weight > fladdling around off-center out there at 2000+ rpm would make matters worse, > not better. Like I said, just curious (and concerned). > My experience with these electronic balancers is: a) if you can't get a consistent reading, something is out of spec, a loose engine mount, worn bearing, off-center mounted/drilled/bored prop b) balancer out of calibration c) Generally it takes me about 5 runs to go from an initial run down to about 0.02 to 0.05 IPS, if it takes more runs and values continue to jump around "the clock", something is not right, a or b. My 5cents, Thomas J.