|
|
And tha answer to your question is----- that's what Lance wanted. Several of us tried to talk him into more fuel. But he was adamant. Several possible reasons why he didn't think it was necessary and or desirable-- 1. it did have a IO 360 in the beginning. 2. We heard a story about an airplane (early precursor to the 235) that had a hotwired foam wing. Lance and Don Goetz were flying across country to an air show and a fuel leak internally- started melting the foam. And the wing started to lose its shape in flight. Don saved the day and got them on the ground. The experience didn't deter Don. (nor should it) He was the first to carry fuel in the last bay outboard (LNC4) of the fuel cap and the aileron push tube dry bay. I believe I was the second.
Charlie K.
On Friday, November 15, 2013 2:45 PM, Gordon Porter <ghp@trustedwealthadvisors.com> wrote:
I have ES-217. I opted to add the "6th bay" in each wing and my useful fuel is 104 gallons. I fly non-stop from south FL (KVNC) to Harrisburg PA (KCXY), 830nm, ~12.7 GPH, LOP in 4:45 or so. Land with 30+ gallons left. Jim, if you check my kitlog build log, you will see pics of the extra bays. Gordon Gordon H. Porter Managing Partner Trusted Wealth Advisors, LLP Registered Principal, Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. 800-290-2632 717-757-4908 fax 717-843-0180 Securities offered through Cambridge Investment Research, Inc.. Member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory Services offered through Cambridge Investment Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Advisor. Tax services are offered by Trusted Wealth Advisors LLP. Trusted Wealth Advisors and the Cambridge Investment Research companies are unaffiliated entities. Trading instructions sent via e-mail may not be honored. Please call our office, or Cambridge
Investment Research trading desk at 800-756-8115 , for all buy/sell orders. Please be advised that communications regarding trades in your account are for informational purposes only. You should continue to rely on confirmations and statements received from the custodian(s) of your assets. The text of this communication is confidential, and use by any person who is not the intended recipient is prohibited. Any person who receives this communication in error is requested to immediately destroy the text of this communication without copying or further dissemination. Your cooperation is appreciated. From: Colyn Case [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:27 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LML] LNCE - Extended range fuel capacity Does anyone know why the ES tanks are so small? I know a lot of people think it's cool to be able to say a plane flies with full tanks and full seats but IMO if pilot + fuel doesn't bring you to gross the tanks are too small. The first time I saw an ES and how big the wings are I thought "Wow, wouldn't it be neat to fill those wings with fuel and make a super long range machine." I can imagine engineering considerations but I wonder if anyone knows for sure. On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:00 AM, James M. Anderson, III P.C. wrote:
Greetings: I’m building a slow build ES (Kit # 11), and just learned that the stock 75 gallon fuel capacity can be enlarged to around 90 gallons. Luckily I’m at the stage where I can add a bay without difficulty. I’ve checked with Lancair, and am awaiting some documentation on how to do that, but wanted to check here to see how others have accomplished the modification. My the way, this is my first post, but surely not the last. 5855 Sandy Springs Circle |
|