Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #54964
From: Wolfgang <Wolfgang@MiCom.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re [LML]: Fuel Pressure Setup
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:17:08 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In the original post from Dennis, I don't recall a specific question but he did have some nice photos of his engine compartment.
 
As for which would be better, metered or unmetered, I would say the metered fuel pressure is more informative and has a direct corelation to fuel flow because pressure through a fixed resistance (tubing and injectors) equates to flow.
 
Wolfgang

From: Dan Ballin <dballin@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel Pressure Setup
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:38:33 -0400
To: lml@lancaironline.net
While I think this is all good information, the original question Jon
had and I have is how to monitor fuel pressure.  The setup procedure
using SID97 is a different issue.  I think the more interesting
question is does one monitor metered or unmetered fuel pressure in the
cockpit.  It seems that TCM and at least Coumbia (Cessna)
recommend/use metered and that Lancair generally sets up their
aircraft to use unmetered.  I haven't gotten a good answer as to why
and what the advantages and disadvanages are.  Obviously the values
are different, but they are measuring essentially the same thing.

Can anyone comment on what advantage/disadvantage there is to using a
metered vs unmetered source for you fuel pressure measurement while
flying.

Dan Ballin
LEG2 #286
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster