Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #54922
From: Colyn Case at earthlink <colyncase@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: fixes for S-TEC 50 alt hold
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:53:14 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
That's amusing Gary.
 
I have a 172rg installation with a 55X in it.   It took me almost a year to get it debugged.
Shortly after my installation (2000) there was a big deal with larger cessna's having this problem, only this time Tom at avionics west provided sufficient evidence that I think stec finally paid attention.
 
However, there was another problem, and that was that the dsub housing on the back of the control module cracked, making it impossible to obtain sufficient insertion force to get a good connection.   It was from this experience that I gained a serious respect for run-away auto-pilots.   especially ones that have auto-trim.
 
since then it's been very good...
 
Colyn
IVP with TruTrak
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Casey
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: fixes for S-TEC 50 alt hold

I don't know whether or not it's related, but in my Cardinal I had a problem with my S-TEC altitude hold when it (the autopilot) was new.  The altitude hold function was divergently unstable - would start to oscillate and then get worse and worse.  Tried all sorts of static systems and finally disconnected the static source entirely and used cabin pressure - seemed to work slightly better.   I was going back and forth with the factory -they initially insisted there was "no problem" and said I should take it back to the installer to have them fix their installation.  Then I broadcast the problem on the net and received replies from all over the world about the same problem.  I sent copies to S-TEC and they immediately said "send it in," so I did.  It came back with no documentation so I called:  "We just checked it out and found no problem."  Oh, yeah?  I installed it and it worked perfectly.  All the earlier S-TEC autopilots, including the 55, used analog circuitry, so the change gain components had to be changed.  They never did admit they had a problem, but I'll bet after that a lot of owners sent theirs back for the same "inspection."
Gary
ES with TruTrack


one other comment on the static source:   the a/p doesn't care how accurate the static source is, only that it changes with altitude.   Therefore some people have found that (on spam cans) putting a dedicated static port in just for the pressure transducer works well.
 
...or you can just use the vents to fine tune your altitude....

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster