Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #39927
From: Bill&Sue <5zq@cox.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Air or nitrogen?
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:18:45 -0500
To: <lml>
Hi Kyrilian,

Nitrogen has several advantages over air in tires.  It's lack of moisture adds to the longevity of the rubber compounds. The lack of oxygen likewise helps preserve the rubber. Nitrogen expands and contracts with temperature less than air helping to keep pressures more constant.

The airlines use nitrogen in their tires for these reasons. Airliner tires are inflated to around 200 psi. Even a small airliner, say an MD80, has a max landing weight of 130,000 lbs and at that weight would touch down around 130 knots. In general they're asking a bunch more out of their tires than we do.

For us in the Lancair world the advantages of nitrogen are simply not worth the trouble. Your tires will wear out WELL before any meaningful decomposition could take place. Since our tires are inflated to somewhere around 50 psi, a given % pressure change from temperature would be a much smaller psi change than airline or military tires.

My suggestion would be to stick with regular air. Use the money you'll save to by avgas.

Then again, you could fill them with helium and you'd need less lift from the wings! :-)

Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,300 hrs
N6ZQ  IV under construction





 Should tires be filled with air or nitrogen?  A few months ago the benefits
of nitrogen for use in oleo struts were discussed.  I  imagine nitrogen is
better, but how critical is this in tires?
   Cheers,
  - Kyrilian


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster