Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #39117
From: Neal Garvin <nrgarvin@comcast.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Overhauled Engine now labeled "Experimental Only" ??
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:52:15 -0500
To: <lml>

Their reasoning was a “non-standard” induction system: 1/4'’ longer studs in the sump with a 3/8” aluminum spacer instead of the stock ¼ phenolic thermal spacer that normally goes between the throttle body servo and sump. In the Glasair, we put a big 90 degree stainless elbow to reposition the servo to allow room for the retracting nose gear. This does not meet Lycoming’s specifications hence “experimental”. I have asked that they be specific in the wording to state what the non-conformance is rather than leaving open ended as written. All other engine parts, both internal and external are per Lycoming specifications.

 

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 11:01 AM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Overhauled Engine now labeled "Experimental Only" ??

 

Does the engine meet the origianl type design according to the type certificate data sheet? If it does not-- ie different pistons for a different compression ratio, etc. then it might be considered experimental. If it not then I would think it would not be experimental.

 

Jeff

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster