Their reasoning was a “non-standard”
induction system: 1/4'’ longer studs in the sump with a 3/8” aluminum
spacer instead of the stock ¼ phenolic thermal spacer that normally goes
between the throttle body servo and sump. In the Glasair, we put a big 90
degree stainless elbow to reposition the servo to allow room for the retracting
nose gear. This does not meet Lycoming’s specifications hence “experimental”.
I have asked that they be specific in the wording to state what the
non-conformance is rather than leaving open ended as written. All other engine
parts, both internal and external are per Lycoming specifications.
From: Lancair Mailing
List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf
Of VTAILJEFF@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006
11:01 AM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Overhauled
Engine now labeled "Experimental Only" ??
Does the engine meet the origianl type
design according to the type certificate data sheet? If it does not-- ie
different pistons for a different compression ratio, etc. then it might be
considered experimental. If it not then I would think it would not be
experimental.