Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #25536
From: Charlie Kohler <ckohler1@cfl.rr.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Formation Flying
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:58:02 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

While I realize that there are "different strokes for different folks", perhaps it's time that a word of caution is entered into the discussion.

Flying is about freedom. Flying Magazine's Lane Wallace captures this feeling and puts it on paper better than anybody I've ever known.

http://www.flyingmag.com/article.asp?section_id=12&article_id=471

This article is typical of those she has written. The freedom of flying a Lancair IV around the country has been a highlight of my Aviation career. I've had the joy of pushing the throttles forward on a very lightly loaded Boeing and that feeling of thrust and climbing at an astounding rate. But nothing, absolutely nothing, approaches the joy of flying over the Sierras mountains in the pressurized Lancair IV, on a nice bright spring day, listening to good music, going where I want to go.

I live in a flying community which has an formation flying organization called Gaggle Flight. I have flown formation with other high-performance airplanes to our Saturday morning breakfasts. One flight (the last one for me) the leader flew us into a flock of vultures, which required that I breakout of the formation. A retired American pilot in the backseat to this day is effusive in his praise of my action which he is certain was essential for saving his life. Had I been locked 100% on a wing tip and not scanning ahead----

I'm also reminded of a recent episode in California with a group of Bonanza's that followed a leader into a canyon.

John and Martha King have addressed the issue of risks in flying.

http://www.kingschools.com/productDetail.asp?itemNo=OOC%20AVMRMCD

The joy of camaraderie at the bar that night- being able to brag that I tucked it in really tight, does not seem to be a reasonable payoff for the RISK of a midair collision.

For those who haven't flown formation, the requirement of concentration is essential. For extended periods of time. A gust/propwash/wing tip vorticies must be met with immediate control inputs.

True, it is a test of skills. But so are many other aspects of flying. A good crosswind landing or a tightly flown on ILS (less than an a needle width from intercept inbound)

But, as for me, I'm not willing to place my life in the hands of someone else while I concentrate on how close I can put my airplane to his.

 

My two cents worth.

Charlie K.

PS ---John Lear on John Lear

"During some off time in 1968 I attempted to ferry a Cessna 320 from Oakland to Australia with the first stop in Honolulu. About 2 hours out from Oakland I lost the right engine and had no provisions for dumping fuel. I went down into ground effect (T effect for you purists) and for 3 hours and 21 minutes flew on one engine  about 25 feet above the waves and made it into Hamilton AFB after flying under the Golden Gate and Richmond bridges."

You'll never guess who was the young Aero Club maintenance officer who changed this engine. And also participated with the FAA in the tear down of that engine. It's amazing what a hole in the top of the piston will do! He also doesn't mention the fact that he threw the HF radio out the door and it hit the horizontal stabilizer.

 

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster