> I can buy
that. What about torque? <
Same . At constant RPM,
Hp is directly proportional to torque. A 1% change in Hp =
to a 1% change in torque - - at constant RPM - - as in 2700 for
takeoff.
****************************
<<<<<What do your EGTs run at full power on take off
? At what fuel flow?
>>>>>>
> As I said in the
post you are responding to, 1280-1290 and 15.4 gph. Note that the fuel
flow could be less than accurate. After a long flight, the EPI totalizer
will claim I used about 5% more fuel than that measured by those very accurate
fill-up trucks (this includes same truck at the same airport on the same
day). Of course, that was not flown at WOT. However, I will record
more environmental data (Baro, Palt, OAT) when I collect this information
next time, including WOT lo altitude runs with and w/o LASAR.
Thanks for keeping at this, <
is the 1280 EGT at takeoff on the LASAR or
on the Magnetos ???
1280-1290 @ 15.4 gph or 90 pph or
(assuming 160 Hp) at a BSFC of about 0.56 (90/160 =
0.56). 1280 sounds **
about ** right at full power for that BSFC at 25d timing, so
maybe the sparks at full power and are not being advanced past
25d. BTW... I much prefer about 0.6 BSFC on these engines for
normally aspirated full power operation - - especially at 25d
timing.
The 9:1 pistons would cause the EGTs to
be a bit lower than stock engines.
Regards, George