Mesazhi #14721 i Listės sė E-mailave lml@lancaironline.net
Nga: <Wclarkstill@aol.com>
Dėrguesi: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Lėnda: Tail Numbers
Data: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 11:02:41 -0400
Pėr: <lml>
In thinking about tail numbers, many of us try to find really short ones.  Expect the following will generate lots of controversy but it is worth thinking about.  Came from a friend who as you'll see thinks short N-numbers have a downside.  ...Clark Still (N750S)

I would definitely avoid anything less than five characters total.

My Lake was renamed (by its previous owner) N3ZQ.  It was awful - a huge
pain in the neck.  Every single time I called any ATC facility, I always had
to say "November Tree Zulu Kebeck" because if I said "Tree Zulu Kebeck" they
would INVARIABLY respond "Tree Zulu Kebeck, say full call sign."  Very
frustrating!

(Luckily I knew to expect it, because during my instrument training I flew a
cherokee 180 that had been renamed (by its previous owner, Frank Brown or
someone like that) N2FB.  Whenever I had checked in as "Two foxtrot bravo"
the response was always "say full call sign" so I was already used to adding
"november.")

Even worse, N3ZQ featured two letters you NEVER want in your call sign.
Avoid "Q" and "Z" at all costs - ATC personnel jot them down on a piece of
paper, then moments later they read them back as "zero" and "two".

Personally, I would prefer a four-number-one-letter call sign such as 1234H,
but without repeating digits.  You get less readback errors from ATC if you
have four non-repeating digits plus one letter (e.g., Comanche 9284P.)

My second choice would be a three-number-two-letter call sign such as 123HY.
(actually if I was getting two letters, I would try for mike mike, or golf
golf, since it's so much quicker to say mike mike than Ho-tel Yan-kee.  but
that's just my passion for brevity.)

Regjistrohu (pėr LAJME Automatike) Regjistrohu (pėr KLASIFIKIME) Pajtohu (pėr INDEKSIME) Ē'regjistrohu Shkruaji Administratorit tė Listės