The scanning should give in the tens of thousands [0.01"] or less depending on what type of equipement used etc.   That in conjunction w/ bolt hold placement that I already have [lots of collected data over the years] I should be able to duplicate the basic geometry. From there it will become a new product in that we want to make it something that works for everyone [or as many as possible] to make it a viable unit. That info, mixed w/ knowing what the 'Standard' mount geometry is should get us where we need to go.

Best regards

Jarrett Johnson
www.innovention-tech.com

----- Original Message -----

From: Kelly Troyer <keltro@att.net>

Date: Monday, April 25, 2011 10:03 am

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake

> Jarrett,
>
>       I do not know exactly what dimensions the scanning give you
> such as bolt
> hole placement, etc.........I presumed
> that the angles of the mount ears needed for the "Dynafoal" mounts
> would be
> "Dead" on though..........
>
>
> Kelly Troyer
> "DYKE DELTA JD2" (Eventually)
> "13B ROTARY"_ Engine
> "RWS"_RD1C/EC2/EM2
> "MISTRAL"_Backplate/Oil Manifold
> "TURBONETICS"_TO4E50 Turbo
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: H & J Johnson <hjjohnson@sasktel.net>
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Sent: Mon, April 25, 2011 10:49:43 AM
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Mistral 'Like' Intake
>
>  Excellent, now I just need to get some Dynafocal dimensions [I've
> seen it on
> the web in the past, just gotta re-locate the dimensional
> 'standards']. That in
> conjunction w/ a few scans & the picture will start to really take
> shape!
>
> I love progress :)
> I can't say Thanks enough Kelly, w/out the help of yourself and
> others it would
> be a much steeper curve to get it up to speed.
>
> Jarrett Johnson
> www.innovention-tech.com
> --  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/  Archive and UnSub:  
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>