Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #54532
From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: 16X Torque and Fuel Economy
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:39:56 -0400
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Twice the HP means twice the fuel burned….Which addresses the 20% fuel improvement of the Renesis. 

The Renesis was supposed to have a higher HP.  That would burn more fuel, not less.  Also it is difficult to have a hairy raging monster engine that just demurely sips fuel at highway speeds.

 

Bill B  Still working on cooling :<( 

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lehanover@aol.com
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:32 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 16X Torque and Fuel Economy

 

 

 

In a message dated 4/15/2011 1:14:28 P.M. Atlantic Daylight Time, eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:

Mazda claims that the 16X will have double the torque (at all rpm) and better fuel economy at high engine speeds.  The Renesis claimed a 20% fuel improvement - but it appeared that was to be found at lower rpm than we operate at.  So hopefully the 16X will be kinder at our rpm range.

 

 

Would not "twice" the torque mean twice the HP?

 

Torque X RPM /5252 = HP

 

Lynn E. Hanover

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster