Bill,
My take on what you are seeing is this:
When advancing the throttle slowly at the staging threshold of
15.5”, the controller stages.
When it does this, the mixture goes lean.
When the mixture goes lean, the engine makes less power and the
RPM decreases.
When the RPM decreases, the air volume required goes down and the
manifold pressure rises even if the throttle setting hasn’t changed right
then.
The increase in manifold pressure requires the controller to
skip to the bins corresponding to the new manifold pressure.
As Ed suggests, looking at the oxygen sensor output (air-fuel
mixture meter) will tell you if things are rich or lean at any given
moment. Looking at the fuel flow will be harder to interpret.
Trying to adjust the staging conditions at a low manifold
pressure makes it harder because the fuel flow change that occurs on staging is
much more significant at low fuel flow rates than at high fuel flow rates.
Personally, I set the staging threshold as high as the primary
injector flow rate will allow. That minimizes the fuel flow change on
staging. At the density altitudes I have to work with, I seldom use the
secondary injectors (stock 460 cc) and the engine makes more than enough power
to fly safely.
Another thing that may be worth looking into is the RPM that the
engine is running at when staging occurs. For my controller, at least,
looking at the mixture correction table address assignments page at the end of
the manual, the addresses make a jump to a different part of the table at 3800
RPM. If the system is staging at close to that RPM, then getting the
system tuned may be even more difficult if the same part of the table isn’t
being used every time staging occurs.
This makes sense to me… but I could be wrong.
Steve Boese
From: Rotary motors in
aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Bradburry
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 8:33 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Staging Adjustment in EC2 since 2006
I have been working with staging for a couple of days and have my
normal confusion.
I have the Renesis engine but I have changed the red primary and
blue secondary injectors to all yellow injectors. This gives me roughly
the same fuel flow capability when all four injectors are on, but a higher flow
capability when only the primary are on as compared to the normal Renesis.
My staging point is set at 15 inches. I know that is lower
than Tracy recommends, but it reduces the cooling requirements while I mess
with it. I may change it later if I figure out what I am doing and get
better (faster) at fixing the settings.
If I have the manifold pressure above the staging point and slowly
lower it, it is a smooth transition and there is no indication that I can see
or hear that the staging has changed. BUT!
If I have the pressure below 15 and slowly raise it, it seems to me
that the engine is trying to make a decision as I go above 15, until I get to
about 15.5, then it suddenly makes a different sound and jumps to
16.0-16.5. These bins are about 43 or 44 at 15 inches and it always jumps
to 47 or 48. The map table levels in this area are close to the
same.
I have not been able to determine if the change need is to lean or
richen the mixture. If you read the study Steve did, it would seem that
it needs to richen??
I tried a suggestion I read of Tracy’s…I checked the
fuel flow just below the stage point, 2.7 gal/hr. then above the stage
point.4.1 gal/hr. This caused me to conclude that I needed to lean
it, so I lowered it back down below the stage point to get started trying it
and Whups! The fuel flow was still at 4+gal/hr! I waited for it to lower
but it didn’t???
I realize this sounds like I am rambling…..so what else is
new!
Any insights would be welcome.
Bill B
From: Rotary motors in
aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Staging Adjustment in EC2 since 2006
Pertaining to
Steve's data and analysis and Tracy's comments about Mode 6 of the EC.
I went back
and read up on the Ec2 modes and found this statement which I had apparently
not paid sufficient attention to, but in light of Steve's data and findings,
thought it might be pertinent to the discussions. From the EC2
instruction Manual:
01-07-06 update.
Because the rotary has two
injectors per rotor and they are staged (see Mode 7 for details on staging), it
is possible that the mixture
might be
miss-matched differently when staged or not staged. You may have to match the EGTs once when
the engine is staged
(low power) and again when
not staged (high power).
So it appears that the EC2
has had the capability to adjust the different in flow rates across the staging
event since at least 2006.
But, perhaps like many others, I was not certain what conditions would
signify this needed adjusting (until Steve's data and analysis) and
therefore never attempted any adjustment (my dumb!) - my philosophy being
if it is working well and you don't have a clue as to what/why you are
adjusting something - then DON'T! {:>)
The only "problem"
(actually more of an irritant than a problem) I have ever encountered
using the EC2 was the staging "bog" I would encounter while operating
on the ground which I finally eliminated. What I did was to enrich
the fuel MAP in the 3-4 bins in the High MAP region that the engine point
jumped to after staging. This did solve my staging bob - but, after
reading the EC2 instructions again, I can see that if I probably should have
used Mode 6 to accomplish this as my adjustment was just for 3-4 bins and not
all bins.
Once again Tracy has
addressed the need in the Ec2/3 - but, I just failed to understand the
function (and conditions) it might have addressed. Now that Steve has
clearly shown there is a high probability that adjusting the staging flow rate
will result in more accurate fuel totalizer values and other fuel
factors, I can now see a reason to use mode 6.
Thanks, guys - discussions on
this list is generally always educational and helpful
Ed