Mesazhi #49078 i Listės sė E-mailave flyrotary@lancaironline.net
Nga: Mike Wills <rv-4mike@cox.net>
Lėnda: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: renesis stock exhaust flange
Data: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:22:52 -0800
Pėr: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Actually Inconel is probably best. I'll grant you that 304 will work (if you go heavy enough) and that its cheaper. Taken to an extreme you could follow Mazda's example and use cast iron.
 
As an example a 1 3/4" x .065" 304 U bend from Burns is about $50 it weighs 2.34#. The same (more or less) bend from Kevin's source is clearly a bargain at about $20. Or you could go with Burns 321 with .032" wall for about $50, same price as their heavier 304. The 321 piece weighs1.28#. That's just one example chosen at random - others may show more or less difference in price.
 
I guess the bottom line is that you are either going to pay extra $ or extra #. I'd guess going with 321 over 304 might have cost me an extra $200. And I probably saved at least 5 pounds in exhaust system weight. The weight saved is actually significantly greater because I'd have ended up adding tail weight to offset the added nose weight.
 
Ya pays yer money and takes yer choice. But to me this was a no brainer and I'd go with 321 again if I were doing it today.
 
Oh, and I'll dispute the claim that Burns gets there bends from the source Kevin cited. I went to Burns shop when I bought all of my bends and I saw their mandrel bender in action.
 
Mike
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:01 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: renesis stock exhaust flange

 Jeff/ Mike,
Yep 321 is the best. A neighbour worked at an airport exhaust shop, they used 321SS exclusively, however they made their own bends out of flat - I guess there's a trick to it. When I enquired about a price, their base price is $1,000.00 - a bit expensive I thought. So I decided that I could go up a bit in thickness and go to what ever bends were available i.e. 316, 304.
 
I guess it's down to the individual -Ed's had no problem with the thicker ( other) SS  
 
I know which way I'm going - the cost effective way.
George ( down under)

I thought that the recommended material for rotary engine exhaust parts was 321 stainless.  Is 304 OK to use?  I thought the temp rating for 321 was higher (like 1500F)?

 

Please correct me if I have incorrect info.

 

 


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of kevin lane
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:31
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] renesis stock exhaust flange

 

I didn't come across this fact in the archives and thought I'd pass it on.  the stock exhaust flanges appear to be made from powdered metal.  when you attempt to weld to them the base metal breaks off very easily.  I was going to modify the stock exhaust, then was talked into a new header, using the original flanges.  it's only money.  better to break on the workbench, no?  I ordered a new 304 flange from ed klepis today.  BTW, Columbia River Mandrel Bending supplies Burns with parts and costs 1/3 to 1/2 the price, plus sells schedule 10 tubing & elbows [.090 wall] as well.  they have been good to deal with.   http://www.mandrel-bends.com/catalog/contact-us.html     kevin

 

interesting to watch mandrel bending.  they pull this "chain" of brass doughnuts thru the tube while bending it.

Regjistrohu (pėr LAJME Automatike) Regjistrohu (pėr KLASIFIKIME) Pajtohu (pėr INDEKSIME) Ē'regjistrohu Shkruaji Administratorit tė Listės