Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #44990
From: Bill Eslick <wgeslick@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:58:57 -0600
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Not sure of which situation you are referring.?

Bill

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

Yes, I would no longer consider porting a six port myself, but back in 92 I knew a bit less about the rotary engine.  Besides, if the rebuilder had either talked me out of it OR had not charged me for it, the situation would have been a bit different. 

 

I personally prefer the turbo block for porting myself.  I used the Racing Beat Street port on my turbo block and it really woke it up.

 

By the way, did Jason get his situation sorted out?


From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Eslick
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 12:06 AM


To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight

 

Ed,



I guess you have seen the Mazdatrix web site where they discourage the whole porting thing with a 6-port.  Just the opposite of what Lynn proposes. 

Bill

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

That's interesting to hear, Bill.  My first engine was an 86 N/A that was suppose to have been street ported (I paid to have it done), but when I later tore it down, much to my surprise there had been no porting done.  So I ported the next engine myself – at least I got my money's worth {:>).

 

 


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster