X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com ([209.85.217.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3460280 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:59:34 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.217.21; envelope-from=wgeslick@gmail.com Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so454303gxk.19 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:58:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=b7VPoNKO9islTYra7Hnen0aw+eR3z9Hv83/WrNLWObY=; b=L+JHDMfiWPWJBnZtAzKDfn9n6ncIHi+cYeKQ4MJ1VyqctYCFOGvDrIfXWbo64LwJNs RYSAYKSwSuuH/qN/Ay+PFv2kzgSPdHK96QosojTdQONzrqOPgvPUP1UKZglsTNuOiH7w fpv3vKnMLusIngAN63rCrLTc+wk8iXvR2HMm4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=R+WVD8ehWXcyUGCKXG+L+BHpnC0viUTSSF8BB7HiiOX1Sryyp3bozHSYKHm413Yq/c iQWXFBPI71wA4PtKYoFkOSOb6ie/oj27ypgeI6RqQLb/549zY9CkopoSME9K9tu9qc8K hV7vr38a/V7X/3np8fh17uO2DcBj4zWS3jIpI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr728589qbh.94.1233323937834; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:58:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:58:57 -0600 Message-ID: <3c14c5540901300558i321730a6iba80fe69667dc6f0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight From: Bill Eslick To: Rotary motors in aircraft Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f923a4b35291f0461b39b7f --00c09f923a4b35291f0461b39b7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not sure of which situation you are referring.? Bill On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Ed Anderson wro= te: > Yes, I would no longer consider porting a six port myself, but back in 9= 2 > I knew a bit less about the rotary engine. Besides, if the rebuilder had > either talked me out of it OR had not charged me for it, the situation wo= uld > have been a bit different. > > > > I personally prefer the turbo block for porting myself. I used the Racin= g > Beat Street port on my turbo block and it really woke it up. > > > > By the way, did Jason get his situation sorted out? > > > > > > Ed > > > > Ed Anderson > > Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered > > Matthews, NC > > eanderson@carolina.rr.com > > http://www.andersonee.com > > http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html > > http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] *O= n > Behalf Of *Bill Eslick > *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2009 12:06 AM > *To:* Rotary motors in aircraft > *Subject:* [FlyRotary] Re: Looking for a rear counterweight > > > > Ed, > > > I guess you have seen the Mazdatrix web site where they discourage the > whole porting thing with a 6-port. Just the opposite of what Lynn > proposes. > > Bill > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Ed Anderson > wrote: > > That's interesting to hear, Bill. My first engine was an 86 N/A that was > suppose to have been street ported (I paid to have it done), but when I > later tore it down, much to my surprise there had been no porting done. = So > I ported the next engine myself =96 at least I got my money's worth {:>). > > > > > --00c09f923a4b35291f0461b39b7f Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not sure of which situation you are referring.?

Bill

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolin= a.rr.com> wrote:

Yes, I would no longer consider po= rting a six port myself, but back in 92 I knew a bit less about the rotary engine.  Besides, if the rebuilder had either talked me out of it OR h= ad not charged me for it, the situation would have been a bit different. =

 

I personally prefer the turbo bloc= k for porting myself.  I used the Racing Beat Street port on my turbo block and it really woke it up.

 

By the way, did Jason get his situ= ation sorted out?

 

 

Ed

 

From: Ro= tary motors in aircraft [mailto:fl= yrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Eslick
Sent: Friday, January 30, = 2009 12:06 AM


To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: L= ooking for a rear counterweight

 

Ed,

=

I guess you have seen the Mazdatrix web site where they discourage the whol= e porting thing with a 6-port.  Just the opposite of what Lynn proposes.=  

Bill

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

That's interesting to hear, Bi= ll.  My first engine was an 86 N/A that was suppose to have been street ported (I paid to have it do= ne), but when I later tore it down, much to my surprise there had been no portin= g done.  So I ported the next engine myself =96 at least I got my money's worth {:>).

 

 


--00c09f923a4b35291f0461b39b7f--