----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:45
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Using OMP rotor
housing only
Yep, the distribution thing is why Mazda has gone to two rotor housing
oil injection ports on the Renesis instead of one. Although the
need to cool the center of the apex seal with oil on the earlier 13B was
probably a factor as well. No more exhaust on the apex seal =
cooler apex seal so less oil injection needed.
If you don't need to meet EPA requirements, premix is best.
Tracy
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:17 PM, <
Lehanover@aol.com> wrote:
The engine will run for some time with the OMP not doing anything. Some
of my gifted engines have had the hoses broken off. There will be a
slight amount of oil added from the oil scrapers on the rotor sides not
being perfect. The scrapers will also scrape off unburned fuel and mix
it with the crankcase oil. High oil temps will remove most of that fuel
through the breather. Note that crankcase breather gases are explosive. A
good reason to smell the dipstick when ever it is out.
So, as the engine wears out the scrapers it starts needing less top
oil.
The only downside to injecting into the housings is poor distribution.
It leaves a boat wake looking stain on the chrome. So, it looks to me like
some of that microscopic amount of oil is discarded without helping anyone.
It seems to me that the best case is the premix. If I were to use the OMP, I
would drop it all in behind the Throttle Body, or into each throat on a
carb. Or if you are a purist, into the float bowl.
Years ago synthetic crank case oil was specifically not
recommended by Mazda. (because of gumming)
Lynn E. Hanover
In a message dated 3/25/2008 10:43:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ALVentures@cox.net
writes:
So it would
also seem to me that using the OMP with 2-cycle oil in this scenario is
significantly different than pre-mix. But is it as effective, more
effective, or
worse??