Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #38196
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Phase 1 completion
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:19:35 -0800
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: FW: Phase 1 completion

Al Gietzen wrote:

The other is that there is something strange about the timing. At low power things appear fine; switching off leading ignition has more effect than switching off trailing, as expected. At operating power levels, however; switching off leading has almost no noticeable effect; whereas switching off trailing drops the rpm by 400+ rpm - which suggests that the timing is very late. Yet advancing the timing via mode 8 does not make any improvement. What is wrong with this picture? It is possible that the added filters caused a delay in the timing, although analysis suggests the effect would be small. Why doesn't advancing the timing improve the power? Is there a timing change to one set of coils associated with disabling the other? We are removing the filtering capacitors from the ignition circuits as a test to see what the effect is.

Just a shot in the dark, but is it possible that you are too far advanced and are reaching peak pressure to soon? Just a slight alignment or measurement error could mess you up, and the rotary's resistance to detonation would mask the problem. A test would be to retard the ignition 1 degree, then disable the leading and trailing to compare the numbers to what you have now.
--------------------
Unless I am mistaken, spark too far advanced would diminish the effect of
the trailing plug and increase the effect of the leading plug.  What I am
seeing is the opposite.

Al

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster