|
Sounds good to me, Mark. I used Mazda connectors for
both the CAS and coils where they interface with the aircraft wiring. While
it is certainly well accepted practice, I do not prefer to pot
connectors. But, having said that, I certainly believe you should adopt
the approach that you prefer.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:55
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Gold Plated
Pins
Ed,
During a recent telephone conversation, Tracy made this very clear
regarding the connector to the Renesis CAS. He strongly suggested
that I either use the factory Mazda connector, or else solder 6"
leads to the connector, pot them, and then use a high quality (gold pins)
weatherproof connector. I plan to use the second
method. This is another single point of failure where a failure
would be very bad if it happens while in the air. So, I'll follow
Tracy's advice on this one.
Mark S.
On 5/17/07, Ed
Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
wrote:
Couldn't agree more, Mark.
Clearly, I should have (at a minimum) wired each
ignition module separately - gold pin or not - since these are high current
draw circuits. If it had failed while flying - I would have
hopefully added to my glider time {:>).
I did so with my two fuel pumps, but clearly
failed to do so with the coils. I would hazard a guess that at time I
did not even consider connector pins as a risk element - the connection
thereto, yes! - but not the pin itself.
Again, this failure emphasizes the point of
eliminating (where feasible) all single points of failure - be they humble
pins or what.
This is one of the reason I always report my little
happenings (no matter how embarrassing {:>)) - so that others
will advance the state of the art (make a new mistake) rather than simply
repeating my mistakes.
It frequently appears (to me at least) that
from the lack of other reported mistakes that I have cornered the
market on them {:>) or perhaps others may have benefited from my
reports and avoided most of them.
Ed
Ed
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:04
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Gold Plated
Pins
Ed,
If I understand what you've said correctly, you have a single point
of failure on a flight critical circuit with this connector? WHat if
it had failed while flying? The best outcome would be that you
would have been able to add another notch to your list of dead-stick
landings. Worst case, well, I won't go there. To me, gold
plated pins would be a must, or else remove the connector from the circuit
and wire it direct. The convenience of quicker panel removal doesn't
make up for the added risk, IMHO.
I followed your advice on fuses vs. circuit breakers and now have all
flight critical circuits controlled by resettable circuit breakers on an
always hot bus. That made good sense. Having a single point of
failure and not using the absolute best parts doesn't make any
sense.
Mark S.
On 5/16/07, Ed
Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com > wrote:
Thanks,
Bob.
I went with tin as my research indicated that was more than
suitable - in fact I think (if memory serves me) that aircraft wire
is tin coated to prevent the copper oxidizing. My plug is
exposed to moisture when the canopy is open, rain/dew,
etc. Also, I did not use any corrosion preventive such as
grease or spray so given all that, perhaps the news is that it held
up so well for so long.
So given its been over 10 years, I
guess gold is not a requirement {:>). Wow! $1200 and its not even
solid gold {:>)
Ed
----- Original Message
----- From: "Bob White" < rlwhite@comcast.net> To: "Rotary motors in
aircraft" <
flyrotary@lancaironline.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007
3:39 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Gold Plated Pins
> On
Wed, 16 May 2007 13:11:26 -0400 > "Ed Anderson" <
eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote: > >
<snip> >> >> Perhaps Bob White can chime in
here, my recommendation would be to go >> with the gold plated
pins vice the tin plated on for critical systems >> especially
where they might be exposed to weather (like the tip up canopy
>> can do). > <snip >> >>
Ed >> Ed Anderson >> Rv-6A N494BW Rotary
Powered >> Matthews, NC >> eanderson@carolina.rr.com >> http://members.cox.net/rogersda/rotary/configs.htm#N494BW >>
http://www.dmack.net/mazda/index.html > >
That's an interesting question Ed. The EFI and coil
connectors use tin > plated connectors also. They are
both sealed so that undoubtedly helps > and I haven't heard of any
major problems in the auto industry caused > by the connections
going bad. I can theoretically get gold or silver >
plated pins for the coil connectors, but the coil is still tin
plated. > Also, for the gold pins, there is a minimum order of
$1200 so there > would have to be a huge demand. :) I don't have
a source for gold or > silver pins for the EFI
connectors. Using a sealed connector might be a >
better way to go. Molex also makes sealed connectors and I
have the 6 > and 8 pin versions of the same Metri-Pack connectors
used on the LS-1 > coils available. That's the larger
one. I use them for the EFI and Coil >
cables. Someday I'll get all this stuff in my catalog.
> > The information I have on gold and silver plating is
related more to > switch contacts. If the switch is
handling a signal (low current) gold > is preferred. If
it's switching power, silver is better. When there >
is arcing, the gold tends to be vaporized leaving the base
material. > I don't know if the silver is less prone to
vaporization or a thicker > layer is used but power switches are
silver plated. > > Bob W. > > -- > N93BD -
Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com > 3.8 Hours Total Time
and holding > Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/ > >
-- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and
UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
-- Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|