Buly,
When do you think that you're going to fly without the
turbo ??

I'm waiting to hear a flight report.

Steve Brooks


--- Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net> wrote:

Thanks Richard. Now I have to learn to fly that
thing without making
a merry widow of my wife :)
Last evening, after removing the turbo and making
bunch of
improvements including IVO electric 68" prop, I
loaded the minister
of finance  (she ordered me ) and went to make three
high speed taxis
with the new prop. What a kick in the back! These
props make big
difference on take off by allowing you to develop
high rpm from the
start. Since I ordered this prop for my turbo
installation, I'm a bit
low on the rpm. Will try it by converting the same
prop (68" with
pitch 45-105 range)  to two blade. My prop
calculator http://
www.hoverhawk.com/propspd.html  tells me for best
thrust I must spin
the engine at least to 6500 - 7000 rpm. I'm about
1000 rpm short
right now. I was surprised to see my manifold
pressure go past 30". i
did not understand why my TAS stays at 18 when the
plane is not
moving, but goes up with the forward speed? I was
expecting to see it
at zero?.
Buly
On Jun 28, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Richard Sohn wrote:

Hi Buly and Ernest,

you guy's can only be proud with your plan-built

projects. You are

way ahead of us kit builders as far as dedication

is concerned in

addition of everything else. I have watched

several Easy builders

over the years, and at my visit to Ernest last

Christmas, I

realized again how much difference there is

between kit and plan

when Ernest explained to me how he managed to

manufacture SS

channel because it could not bought anywhere. I

think plan-builders

are the creme of the experimenters community.
FWIW.

Richard Sohn
N-2071U

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:
http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/

--
Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/