flyrotary@lancaironline.net Mailing List Archive

Ah, Bill J, but the ones who contribute the most also represent the biggest threat to his ego. If he can't convince, browbeat, intimidate , threaten or otherwise get you to conform to his view or opinion, then you must go - otherwise his followers may begin to believe you know as much as he does. That can not be allowed of course. This is done in the interest of protecting his flock from erroneous ideas. Too bad, he can be a nice and personable fellow when not threatened.

Just my opinion of course, not a trained psychiatrist, although I did sleep at a Holiday Inn once or twice.

Ed A

----- Original Message -----

From: wrjjrs@aol.com

To: Rotary motors in aircraft

Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:57 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication

You got banned Bill?

I am amazed that the people who contribute the most through the site seem to be the ones excommunicated! The front mount layout will be of great help to us all, though as I'm sure you know it isn't the ONLY way!

Bill Jepson

-----Original Message-----
From: William <wschertz@ispwest.com>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:07:45 -0600
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication

I would guess (based on the traffic I saw) that it is because he decided to use a sandwich plate motor mount, rather than a beam mount with the rear mount being welded to the oil pan.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:24 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication

>
> The "Pope" has spoken. Apparently I impuned his design. That is not
> allowed!
> -------------
> Bill;
>
> Just curious - what was it you said that he disagreed with; or do you > know?
>
> Al&nb