X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 867071 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:25:32 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-024-074-025-165.carolina.res.rr.com [24.74.25.165]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id jB7JOP1u016135 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:24:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001301c5fb63$d5e8b920$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:24:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C5FB39.ECC665E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C5FB39.ECC665E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah, Bill J, but the ones who contribute the most also represent the = biggest threat to his ego. If he can't convince, browbeat, intimidate = , threaten or otherwise get you to conform to his view or opinion, then = you must go - otherwise his followers may begin to believe you know as = much as he does. That can not be allowed of course. This is done in = the interest of protecting his flock from erroneous ideas. Too bad, he = can be a nice and personable fellow when not threatened. Just my opinion of course, not a trained psychiatrist, although I did = sleep at a Holiday Inn once or twice. Ed A ----- Original Message -----=20 From: wrjjrs@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:57 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication You got banned Bill? I am amazed that the people who contribute the most through the site = seem to be the ones excommunicated! The front mount layout will be of = great help to us all, though as I'm sure you know it isn't the ONLY way! Bill Jepson =20 -----Original Message----- From: William To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:07:45 -0600 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication I would guess (based on the traffic I saw) that it is because he = decided to use a sandwich plate motor mount, rather than a beam mount = with the rear mount being welded to the oil pan.=20 Bill Schertz=20 KIS Cruiser # 4045=20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gietzen" =20 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =20 Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:24 AM=20 Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another Excommunication=20 =20 >=20 > The "Pope" has spoken. Apparently I impuned his design. That is not=20 > allowed!=20 > -------------=20 > Bill;=20 >=20 > Just curious - what was it you said that he disagreed with; or do = you > know?=20 >=20 > Al&nb ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C5FB39.ECC665E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ah, Bill J, but the ones who contribute the most = also=20 represent the biggest threat to his  ego.  If he can't = convince,=20 browbeat, intimidate , threaten or otherwise get you to conform to = his view=20 or opinion, then you must go -  otherwise his followers may begin = to=20 believe you know as much as he does.  That can not be allowed of=20 course.  This is done in the interest of protecting his flock = from=20 erroneous ideas.  Too bad, he can be a nice and personable fellow = when not=20 threatened.
 
Just my opinion of course, not a trained = psychiatrist,=20 although I did sleep at a Holiday Inn once or twice.
 
Ed A
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 wrjjrs@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, = 2005 1:57=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Another=20 Excommunication

You got banned Bill?
I am amazed that the people who contribute the most through the = site seem=20 to be the ones excommunicated! The front mount layout will be of great = help to=20 us all, though as I'm sure you know it isn't the ONLY way!
Bill Jepson
 
-----Original Message-----
From: = William=20 <wschertz@ispwest.com>
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: = Wed, 7=20 Dec 2005 09:07:45 -0600
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Another=20 Excommunication

I would guess = (based on=20 the traffic I saw) that it is because he decided to use a sandwich = plate motor=20 mount, rather than a beam mount with the rear mount being welded to = the oil=20 pan. 
Bill Schertz 
KIS Cruiser # 4045 
----- = Original=20 Message ----- From: "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures@cox.net> 
= To:=20 "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net= > 
Sent:=20 Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:24 AM 
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Another=20 Excommunication 
 

> The "Pope" has = spoken.=20 Apparently I impuned his design. That is not 
>=20 allowed! 
> ------------- 
>=20 Bill; 

> Just curious - what was it you said = that he=20 disagreed with; or do you > know? 

> = Al&nb=20
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C5FB39.ECC665E0--