Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #27445
From: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Rusty's next project dilemma was Re: Another Run - with Questions
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:25:36 -0600
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Ok, Rusty, I'll ask.  What makes the Xl more attractive to you than an RV-8? Not a bad aircraft from what I read, but don't think it can really compare to bang for buck of an RV-8?
Curious minds want to know. 
 
Hi Ed,
 
Well, all you have to do is wait a few hours, and the RV-8 will be back in the lead :-)    I didn't really intend to bog the list with this stuff, but since you asked, and since it is rotary related...
 
The Zenith 601XL is a nice plane by all accounts, and it's Sport Pilot legal.  I don't have any foreseeable requirement for a SP plane, but realistically, it's all I ever needed for the type flying I do.  My primary interest in the XL is that it's almost ideal for a single rotor engine installation.  The cowl is big, and they allow up to 300 lbs FWF.  In fact, they have an O-235 engine option, which weighs in at slightly more than 300 lbs I think.  HP requirement is 100-125.  Performance is the max allowed (plus some I suspect) for SP, and it's a nice looking plane, simple to build, etc. 
 
The biggest drawback is the price of the kit, particularly when you add all the options.  You could build an RV-X airframe for a couple thousand cheaper, if you used a standard kit (which I wouldn't).  I also much prefer centerline seating, and the XL is only available in side by side.   
 
In my opinion, the RV-8 is the very best experimental plane every designed.  I loved flying the one I had before, but felt guilty about the money I had tied up in it, particularly when I realized that I could make money by selling it.  With a Renesis engine (maybe turbo), it would be a great plane, though resale would suffer.  On the other hand, I wouldn't have nearly as much money in it, so I wouldn't feel as guilty, and I'd have something to tinker with, which would make me want to keep it longer.  
 
With a Lycoming, inverted oil, and a CS prop, the RV-8 is an awesome plane, and it would be a better investment than my 401K has been.  I would have to decide if I wanted to build it to maximize what I'd make on resale, or whether I would be happy to break even eventually.
 
The only other sticky issue with the RV-8 is that I'd hate to embarrass Tracy by ordering a kit now, and having it flying before he flies his :-)
 
Sorry you asked yet :-) 
 
Cheers,
Rusty (just kidding Tracy, please don't sabotage my EC-2 <g>)
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster