Re: [FlyRotary] Switching to Evans
NPG+
After careful consideration, I think I am going to
switch to Evans NPG (100% propylene glycol) during my annual this
year when I flush the cooling system. Here is how I see
it:
Disadvantages:
1. I will probably run a higher cooling temp, about
20-30deg higher best I can tell, This will put my hottest
temps up around 250F. I think the coolant o-rings should be able
to withstand that. Otherwise, the increased temps will improve
heat rejection and possibly BSFC without other negative impact.
Running higher coolant temps should also partially offset the
decreased specific heat of the NPG (better temperature difference in
the radiator).
2. Initial cost and hassle flushing the
system.
3. Higher oil temp. - Oil temps are not a
problem for me, if anything I would like to see them up into to 180
range (currently 140-160).
Advantages:
1. No risk of boil over. I had one in-flight
boil over when using 50/50 EG. That was a real pain. Once
it gets to boiling over it is very difficult to get it to cool down,
and it can be hard to find water at some airports. Also, a small
leak in an EG or water system will drop the pressure and cause
boil over very quickly.
2. Antifreeze. Running water with water wetter
did decrease my temps by 20 deg, but I could not leave the plane
parked overnight in the mountains for fear of possibly freezing the
coolant. So before flying to any place cold I had to drain out
the water and add EG. That was a real pain, and now my temps are
back up near the boiling point of the water /EG
mix.
3. Longer coolant life and better corrosion control.
Evans clams NPG+ will last the life of the engine, but I will
obviously replace it every 5 years when replacing the cooling
hoses.
4. Non-toxic. I am frequently dripping EG in the
hangar every time I do work on something. Would prefer something
non-toxic.
5. Low pressure cooling system that does not change
pressure with altitude... I eventually plan to get into the
flight levels but that would mean that my boil over temp drops
dramatically.
6. Better control of nucleate boiling. Not sure
if this is good, bad, or indifferent. Evans claims it
significantly improves the margin of safety for detonation and allows
increased spark advance. Others claim that nucleate boiling is
important for cooling very hot spots.
Comments? Anyone have real life experience with
NPG they could share?
Dave Leonard
Yes I used NPG for several years and several hundred hrs
and it worked fine but I have switched back to 60 percent Sierra
propylene glycol to 40 water mixture, the reason was that NPG get real
thick when it gets cold and I fly in subzero temps in the winter so I
had concerns about it gelling and and creating problems in cooling and
maybe undo stress on the water pump belts on startups or
decent's.
Rob Golden at Pineapple racing uses NPG and swears by it
but he also had concerns about the cold temp I fly in, if your not
flying in subzero temps I would use it.
Ken Welter
|