The bottom line as we know is
that ultimately the air flow has to carry all the heat away from the
installation. So oil to water heat exchangers end up needing (as Ken
points out) a larger radiator (possibly 1/3 larger) to handle the additional
heat dumped into the coolant by the oil/water exchanger..
Just an added comment, the amount of
heat exchanger volume added to the coolant rad is more than would be needed for
the direct to air oil cooler for two reasons: the temp drop from oil to water,
and the upper temp limit on the coolant is generally lower than on the oil; both
resulting in lower temp for rejecting the heat – therefore bigger
volume. If you have the room; the additional volume is less expensive,
and may not weigh as much, because of the lower pressure and viscosity.
I believe that oil/water heat
exchangers might be justified in an aircraft installation if for some reason
the lay-out precluded getting air to an oil cooler but did permit you to
install a larger radiator capable of handling the heat load for the coolant and
oil. Otherwise, I don't believe they would work very well in most of
our installations. There could be exceptions of course.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January
07, 2005 1:24 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary]
Re: fluidyne oil cooler
I
tried a 85,000 btu fluidyne oil to water heat exchanger but it sent my water
temp through the roof so I abandoned it as I would have had to increase the radiator
size.
If
anyone is interested I would sell it for $200
Al, yes C&R makes their own oil-to-water
coolers. I have never talked to them to ask about pressure drop on the
oil side. They sure build good looking stuff though (how's that for
scientific!!!(grin)).
Ken Powell
Bryant, Arkansas