Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #12348
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:27:48 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Dube
Sent:
Wednesday, October 20, 2004 12:00 PM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP

 


Looking at the relationship between speed, flow and power dissipation, I come to a different conclusion.  The pump output curve goes up relatively linearly with speed  and bends over toward flat as the back pressure builds.  The power dissipation required (with a prop) goes up roughly as the cube of the speed (parabolically), so it goes up slowly at first and then heads up pretty steep as you get past 3-4000 rpm.


        Because the heat transfer behavior of the radiator and the engine block are NOT simple functions of water flow, you really gain no insight by doing simple flow calculations. You have to do the experiment, or do the computer model of the whole system. In reality, you would end up doing both.

        The heat transfer formulas are very complicated and VERY non-linear.

Bill;

You’re right, of course.  I was just looking at first principals; ability of the coolant to carry heat from engine to radiator.  That is linear and is a function only of heat capacity, assumed delta T , and flow rate.  That’s the first thing to consider for the design point you chose, and a condition that has to be met.  From there it is very complex on what the delta T actually is.  Yes, I suppose that inferring from this what the margin is at conditions off the design point is stretching it.

Al

 

>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/

>>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster