X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:43:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-alt2.hserv16.homehost.com.br ([177.85.103.23] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0) with ESMTPS id 5953055 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:56:12 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=177.85.103.23; envelope-from=ppxsn@novellisouza.com.br Received: from [187.83.22.172] (port=56124) by hserv16.homehost.com.br with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TkKJD-0003e9-Ed for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:55:36 -0200 From: Silvio Novelli Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_551BE60C-2DEC-4739-9A7F-B00C4ED59072" Subject: Re: [LML] Which coax for antennae? X-Original-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:55:29 -0200 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <7E078BCB-1114-4A90-BE91-9C817939D6E3@novellisouza.com.br> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hserv16.homehost.com.br X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - novellisouza.com.br X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hserv16.homehost.com.br: authenticated_id: silvio@novellisouza.com.br --Apple-Mail=_551BE60C-2DEC-4739-9A7F-B00C4ED59072 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I installed my radios using RG-58 and it performed very good, but after = 3 years I'm observing some degradation on the received signal. Only = experience I have. Silvio Novelli Lancair 320 PP-XSN +55 (14) 9614-3129 On 16 Dec 2012,w 51, at 2:15 PM, = wrote: Posted for Jon Hadlich : You get what you pay for. RG =3D58 is 1950's technology. RG -400 is = modern, double shielded, tefezel type jacketed and spec'ed in all modern install manuals as the coax required. Spend the extra $100-$200 ( for the simple install) and receive a lifetime of quality radio performance. --=20 Jon Hadlich AI Systems (541) 815-7381 [Thanx for the input. Will do. ] -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --Apple-Mail=_551BE60C-2DEC-4739-9A7F-B00C4ED59072 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I = installed my radios using RG-58 and it performed very good, but after 3 = years I'm observing some degradation on the received signal. Only = experience I have.

Silvio = Novelli

Lancair 320 PP-XSN

+55 (14) = 9614-3129

On 16 Dec 2012,w 51, at 2:15 PM, <marv@lancair.net> <marv@lancair.net> = wrote:

Posted for Jon Hadlich <hackmo15@gmail.com>:

= You get what you pay for. RG =3D58 is 1950's technology. RG -400 is modern,
= double shielded, tefezel type jacketed and spec'ed in all modern = install
manuals as the coax required. Spend the extra $100-$200 ( for the = simple
install) and receive a lifetime of quality radio = performance.

--
Jon Hadlich
AI Systems
(541) 815-7381

[Thanx for the input. = Will do. <marv> ]

--

For archives and unsub http://mail.=
lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

= --Apple-Mail=_551BE60C-2DEC-4739-9A7F-B00C4ED59072--