X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:25:15 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com ([69.89.24.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c3) with SMTP id 5930495 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:41:11 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.89.24.6; envelope-from=danny@n107sd.com Received: (qmail 14838 invoked by uid 0); 9 Dec 2012 17:40:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host295.hostmonster.com) (66.147.240.95) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2012 17:40:35 -0000 Received: from [71.178.196.38] (port=1680 helo=DannyLaptop) by host295.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Thkrf-0001nI-8V for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 10:40:34 -0700 From: "Danny" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: nose gear gas spring X-Original-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:40:23 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003001cdd634$46eec8f0$d4cc5ad0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0031_01CDD60A.5E18C0F0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac3WK6Ve26p9VfH4TEiXF9srDkMg8gACHX8g Content-Language: en-us X-Identified-User: {3234:host295.hostmonster.com:wunderwe:n107sd.com} {sentby:smtp auth 71.178.196.38 authed with danny@n107sd.com} This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CDD60A.5E18C0F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doubtful, but maybe. Seeing is believing and I=E2=80=99d sure like to = see the W&B & performance numbers too. Even if it was done, the = endurance would probably only be about 2 hours at 18 gph. =20 =20 =20 Danny LNC2-360 N 38=C2=B0 43' 25.7" W 77=C2=B0 30' 38.6" Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. =20 From: steve [mailto:n5276j@aol.com]=20 Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 11:39 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: nose gear gas spring =20 IT IS TRUE AND I HAVE SEEN THE PHOTOS, I DON'T SEE WHY IT IS NOT DOABLE, = IF YOU HAVE THE BIG TAIL AND SHORT MOUNT, NO HEADER TANK, MAYBE YOU = SHOULD THINK AGAIN.=20 =20 STEVE ALDERMAN =20 N25SA 360 150TT -----Original Message----- From: Danny To: lml Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 12:58 pm Subject: [LML] Re: nose gear gas spring Me too Ed. I really hate to say BS to an IO-540 installation but the CG = would be WAY out of whack. Honestly, I just don=E2=80=99t believe it. =20 Danny LNC2-360 N 38=C2=B0 43' 25.7" W 77=C2=B0 30' 38.6" Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool. =20 From: Ed Gray [mailto:egraylaw@swbell.net = ]=20 Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 7:47 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] nose gear gas spring =20 Danny, I agree that old doesn=E2=80=99t mean bad. But they are good = until one day, then they are weak. The replacements are 18 bucks, so I = wouldn=E2=80=99t reinstall an old one regardless of test. Lancair has 4 = models, which one is for L360? I can=E2=80=99t wait to see the IO540 install. The 360 is tight enough. = Ed Gray ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CDD60A.5E18C0F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Doubtf= ul, but maybe.=C2=A0 Seeing is = believing and I=E2=80=99d sure like to see the W&B & = performance numbers too.=C2=A0 = Even if it was done, the endurance would probably only be about 2 = hours at 18 gph.=C2=A0 =

Danny

=

LNC2-360<= /p>

N 38=C2=B0 43' = 25.7"

W 77=C2=B0 30' = 38.6"

Nothing is foolproof to a = sufficiently talented fool.

From: steve [mailto:n5276j@aol.com] =
Sent: Sunday, = December 09, 2012 11:39 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: nose gear gas = spring

I= T IS TRUE AND I HAVE SEEN THE PHOTOS, I DON'T SEE WHY IT IS NOT DOABLE, = IF YOU HAVE THE BIG TAIL AND SHORT MOUNT, NO HEADER TANK, MAYBE YOU = SHOULD THINK AGAIN.

&= nbsp;

S= TEVE ALDERMAN

&= nbsp;

N= 25SA 360 150TT

-= ----Original Message-----
From: Danny <danny@n107sd.com>
To: lml = <lml@lancaironline.net>
Se= nt: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 12:58 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: nose gear gas = spring

Me = too Ed.=C2=A0 I really hate to = say BS to an IO-540 installation but the CG would be WAY out of = whack.=C2=A0 Honestly, I just = don=E2=80=99t believe it.<= o:p>

= <= o:p>

Danny<= o:p>

LNC2-360<= o:p>

N 38=C2=B0 43' = 25.7"<= o:p>

W 77=C2=B0 30' = 38.6"<= o:p>

Nothing is foolproof to a = sufficiently talented fool.<= o:p>

= <= o:p>

From:= Ed Gray [mailto:egraylaw@swbell.net] =
Sent: Friday, = December 07, 2012 7:47 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] nose gear gas = spring<= o:p>

<= o:p>

Danny, I agree that old doesn=E2=80=99t mean bad. But they are = good until one day, then they are weak. The replacements are 18 = bucks, so I wouldn=E2=80=99t reinstall an old one regardless of = test. Lancair has 4 models, which one is for = L360?<= o:p>

I can=E2=80=99t wait to see the IO540 install. The 360 is tight = enough. Ed Gray<= o:p>

------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CDD60A.5E18C0F0--