X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:16:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTP id 5361038 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:05:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.147; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.77]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0NF55rD020905 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:05:06 -0500 Received: from core-mnd003c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mnd003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.107.9]) by mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id AF240E000094 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:05:06 -0500 (EST) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] IV-P wing close-out questions In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CEA7F787422E0B_1028_60FD5_webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 35363-STANDARD Received: from 75.33.124.13 by webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com (205.188.167.86) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:05:07 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CEA7F7873644FB-1028-1CBA2@webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [75.33.124.13] X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:05:06 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:457825088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294d4f1d77221265 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CEA7F787422E0B_1028_60FD5_webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" That is the preferred method. Call Mark Mahnke at RDD for the amount neede= d. Is it acceptable to just use Hysol for all bonding surfaces? The manual ha= s two methods, both of which call for various areas to be bonded with epoxy= /flox. I like the longer working time of the Hysol. -----Original Message----- From: Dan & Kari Olsen To: lml Sent: Tue, Jan 10, 2012 11:58 am Subject: [LML] IV-P wing close-out questions LML Gang, =20 I=E2=80=99m getting very close to closing out the right wing on my IV-P pro= ject and have a few questions for you all. 1. Is it acceptable to just use Hysol for all bonding surfaces? The = manual has two methods, both of which call for various areas to be bonded w= ith epoxy/flox. I like the longer working time of the Hysol. 2. How much Hysol will be required to close out one wing? =20 Thanks! =20 Dan Olsen ----------MB_8CEA7F787422E0B_1028_60FD5_webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" That is the preferred metho= d. Call Mark Mahnke at RDD  for the amount needed.
Is it = acceptable to just use Hysol for all bonding surfaces?  The manual has= two methods, both of which call for various areas to be bonded with epoxy/= flox.  I like the longer working time of the Hysol.



= -----Original Message-----
From: Dan & Kari Olsen <olsen25@comcast.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, Jan 10, 2012 11:58 am
Subject: [LML] IV-P wing close-out questions

LML Gang,
 
I=E2=80=99m getting very close to closing out the ri= ght wing on my IV-P project and have a few questions for you all.
1.       Is it accept= able to just use Hysol for all bonding surfaces?  The manual has two m= ethods, both of which call for various areas to be bonded with epoxy/flox.&= nbsp; I like the longer working time of the Hysol.
2.       How much Hys= ol will be required to close out one wing?
 
Thanks!
 
Dan Olsen
----------MB_8CEA7F787422E0B_1028_60FD5_webmail-d027.sysops.aol.com--