X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:19:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from webmail2.lsn.net ([66.90.130.102] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTPS id 4573758 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:29:57 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.90.130.102; envelope-from=mmcmanus@grandecom.net Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail2.lsn.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAAFT8TA031320 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:29:10 -0600 Received: from 204.152.239.219 ([204.152.239.219]) by webmail.grandecom.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:29:08 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <20101110092908.41865hxhu03v2mo4@webmail.grandecom.net> X-Original-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:29:08 -0600 From: mmcmanus@grandecom.net X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Upgrade your ignition and help LOBO References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Originating-IP: 204.152.239.219 Bill, I am considering going with the E-Mags. Can you provide some details on your use in your 320? Are you using two of the the P-version Emags, or one regular and one P-version? Was installation as easy as they indicate on their website? I'm kicking around the idea of one E-Mag and one magneto - thoughts? Anything else that you can think of about the E-Mags would be helpful. Thanks, Matt McManus LNC2 360 Quoting Bill Harrelson : > John, > > Yes, it's frustrating. I've been waiting for my 6 cylinder E-Mags > for well over a year. HOWEVER, every time I talk to them they are > extremely clear that they have not set a date for release. Only when > I really press them will they give me their "guess". They make sure > to say that their guesses are usually wrong and that they are not > promises or schedules. Actually, I find it a bit refreshing compared > to some of the "it'll ship next week" promises that I've heard from > other manufacturers. > > I've been using their 4 cylinder product on our 320 for a little > over 500 hours. I have found it to be more dependable and far more > efficient than a standard magneto. At the same true airspeed I save > almost 1 gallon per hour (160 hp stock Lyc O-320) over a magneto. > This fuel savings has easily paid for the ignition system. If this > same efficiency and dependability carries over to the Continental 6 > cylinder, I can't imagine any reason not to install it. > > I have no connection to E-Mag, financial or otherwise, and am > passing on this information only as a report of the results that I > have had with their product. > > > > Bill Harrelson > N5ZQ 320 1,850 hrs > N6ZQ IV under construction > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- From: John Schroeder > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 12:33 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: Upgrade your ignition and help LOBO > > I agree with Doug - it is one of the best examples of vapor hardware ever. > BTW, are the 4 cylinder ones "certified"? > > Thanks, > > John Schroeder > LNCE, 420 hours > > > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > >