Return-Path: Received: from imo-r16.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.70]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 08:00:43 -0400 Received: from N295VV@aol.com by imo-r16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id k.3b.5518c69 (14376) for ; Thu, 25 May 2000 08:06:12 -0400 (EDT) From: N295VV@aol.com Message-ID: <3b.5518c69.265e7134@aol.com> Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 08:06:12 EDT Subject: Re: ES Vertical Stab building problems To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Jim Cameron writes: VStab was not symmetrical; i.e., if you cut a cross-section in a plane parallel to the floor and looked at it from above, you'd see that one side was considerably less convex that the other. Jim, Lack of a symmetrical profile could be a problem. The more convex surface probably may lift sideways more than the other side, causing a yaw that needs to be compensated for. The Vertical Stab on the IV was fairly symmetrical, as I remember it. On the other hand, the P-forces of the prop sweeping in a spiral motion around the tail probably do the same thing....Bottom Line: What does the factory support say? David Jones >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>