Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 03:05:54 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-92248@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <skiplong@videocomm.com>
Received: from smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com ([66.163.168.185] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3)
  with SMTP id 92231 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 27 May 2004 02:37:11 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO vc2) (skiplong@sbcglobal.net@62.103.25.100 with login)
  by smtp806.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2004 06:37:10 -0000
Reply-To: <skiplong@videocomm.com>
From: "Skip Long" <skiplong@videocomm.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Carbon vs. E-glass cowls
X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:35:03 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <001501c443b4$bf40dd50$0501a8c0@vc2>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

Hi All,

Can someone give me the plus and minus of using e-glass cowls vs.
carbon.
I ordered carbon with my original LIV kit only to find out that they are
to small for the Lancair fast build TSIO-550. This was not found out
until I had completed all the fabrication on the lower cowl. Now I'm
looking at 12-16 weeks for Lancair to get a carbon cowl from the
Philippines. Naturally e-glass is available now.

Any turbine upgrade's have a set of carbon cowls laying around?

Any input is helpful.

Skip


Skip Long
Video Communications
mailto:skiplong@videocomm.com.