Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 00:31:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailfe07.swip.net ([212.247.154.193] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3) with ESMTP id 3236347 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 May 2004 00:26:42 -0400 X-T2-Posting-ID: pjoir+jHq+gkrQt/OFQDHQ== Received: from [81.211.186.42] (HELO tele2.it) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b4a) with ESMTP id 38229137 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 May 2004 06:26:40 +0200 X-Original-Message-ID: <40A83EFA.7090708@tele2.it> X-Original-Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 06:26:34 +0200 From: "John F. Herminghaus" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en,it,fr,de MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: More spins again References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Marvin Kaye wrote: > Posted for "David Allen" : > > snip, > When the Lancair factory went to certify this airframe they could > never get it to recover to the part 23 standards and in fact certified > it as spin "resistant". > snip The Lancair 400 is certified to FAR 23 spin standards. To do this major changes to the empennage such as split rudders and elevators were necessary.