Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:56:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1) with ESMTP id 2530765 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:40:27 -0400 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.146.1744302e (4362) for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:40:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Billhogarty@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <146.1744302e.2c704513@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 22:40:19 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair IV Prop X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_146.1744302e.2c704513_boundary" X-Mailer: 7.0 for Windows sub 10625 --part1_146.1744302e.2c704513_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim: Thank you for the info on the MT-4 blade prop. I am sure that many others on the list will also appreciate the info. Do you have any data that you can share with us?. Climb performance, cruise data, etc. When I have my machine flying again, it would be interesting to compare some in-flight performance; assuming that I end up with a 3 - blade prop. Appreciate your reply....Bill Hogarty --part1_146.1744302e.2c704513_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim:

Thank you for the info on the MT-4 blade prop. I am sure that many oth= ers on the list will also appreciate the info.

Do you have any data that you can share with us?. Climb performance, c= ruise data, etc. When I have my machine flying again, it would be inte= resting to compare some in-flight performance; assuming that I end up=20= with a 3 - blade prop.

Appreciate your reply....Bill Hogarty --part1_146.1744302e.2c704513_boundary--