Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:38:16 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2530698@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <harrelson@erols.com>
Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.62] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1)
  with ESMTP id 2530577 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:29:17 -0400
Received: from 208-59-158-241.s241.tnt2.frdb.va.dialup.rcn.com ([208.59.158.241] helo=OFFICE)
	by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 19o7fo-0002hN-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:29:16 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <02fe01c36435$23072160$f19e3bd0@OFFICE>
From: "Bill & Sue" <harrelson@erols.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2530486@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Auto Gas in O-320s
X-Original-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 16:29:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000



> I have been told that running 1/2 auto gas is good. Is this true?

Hi Lorn,

I've been using a mixture of 100LL and Amoco 93 in my O-320 for a couple of
years now. I keep roughly a 50/50 mixture in the tanks. Works just fine,
I've had no problems. I've used 100% Amoco on many occasions with no
noticeable difference. Since I'm carbureted, I don't have any of the
vaporization problems that Bill R. mentioned. As I recall, you're carbureted
also, right?

Bill
harrelson@erols.com
N5ZQ  LNC2  O-320  VA42  Fredericksburg, VA