Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:44:48 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2523706@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <glcasey@adelphia.net>
Received: from mta11.adelphia.net ([64.8.50.205] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1)
  with ESMTP id 2523655 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:00:20 -0400
Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by mta11.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with SMTP
          id <20030815130020.NENG7060.mta11.adelphia.net@worldwinds>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 15 Aug 2003 09:00:20 -0400
From: "Gary Casey" <glcasey@adelphia.net>
X-Original-To: "lancair list" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: tailplane angle of incidence
X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 05:59:11 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <NEBBIBKBKLGPNKKOGMMBEEPKFAAB.glcasey@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal

<<N63LS, Super ES, now has 1.8 hrs in the air - the first 0.4 by Mike DeHate
and the remainder by yours truly.
A few issues to deal with, but all-in-all a very successful day.  Need more
up elevator trim so will have to enlarge the trim tab.>>

There was a discussion about angle of incidence some time back - is this a
symptom that the tailplane angle of incidence should be set at something
other than what the factory suggests?

Gary Casey
ES #157, getting close to attaching the stab