Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:58:15 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2517330@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <JJJOHNSON@ACCESSCOMM.CA>
Received: from qmail.accesscomm.ca ([204.83.142.82] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1)
  with SMTP id 2517320 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:52:13 -0400
Received: (qmail 591 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2003 14:51:38 -0000
Received: from cust140-67.weyburn-leg.accesscomm.ca (HELO Jarrett) (216.174.140.67)
  by qmail.accesscomm.ca with SMTP; 11 Aug 2003 14:51:38 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <009801c36018$0368fe80$8200a8c0@Jarrett>
From: "JJ JOHNSON" <JJJOHNSON@ACCESSCOMM.CA>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2516789@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel tank testing
X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:51:14 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

With all this talk of pressure testing and barometric pressure ets.  I'm
wondering if a person couldn't use the glove AND and airspeed indicator to
check your wing?  The glove is your fail-safe so you don't over pressure and
the airspeed indicator won't be affected by barometric pressure will it?  Or
maybe it will and I totally out to lunch. I'm curious as our wings are ready
to close, but need their pre-close inspection first!


Jarrett Johnson
235/320 50ish%