Return-Path: Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.38]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:34:26 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.35.) id k.d1.4810dc (3317) for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 16:42:29 EST Subject: Re: Testing Sight Gauges To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 12/23/0 10:22:21 PM, you wrote: <> This is true. I once ran a hydrotest on a small rocket engine casing before I loaded it with solid rocket propellant. This gizmo was about 18 inches long and about 2 inches ID. I filled it with water in case it failed. I then had it in a blast chamber at the USAF Academy (where I was a Visiting Professor at the time) and pressurized the case from the other side of the blast wall. (I may be crazy, but I'm not stupid.) The flange on the end of the casing failed, and while so doing snapped the bolts holding on the end plate. I was then left with a tube of water with 160 psi air forcing the water out one end with nothing to hold it down. I realized something was amiss when I heard a very large BANG. I confirmed my suspicion when I looked over at the cadet I was working with and his eyes were as big as dinner plates. I then looked at the pressure gauge -- which read zero -- and said "oops!" It took us about five minutes to find the motor case. It was no longer connected to the pressurizing apparatus (which was pretty substantial, by the way). Our first clue as to what happened was the big dent in the ceiling. The motor case had launched itself and ripped away from the pressure line, then landed on the floor and rolled under a workbench. Just barely missing the $30,000 instrumentation system that the department was storing in the blast chamber. They thought I was being reckless, and I thought they were being stupid for using a blast chamber as a storage facility. Mostly they were just upset because they hadn't realized that rocket engine testing was hazardous. (well, duh!) Of course I had been following written procedures, but after this incident, a Lieutenant Colonel had to sign them off... So Dick Alden is right, pressure tests can be hazardous. I was planning on being around the corner and only going to about 50 psi. And pointing it the other way.... - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>