Return-Path: Received: from postoffice2.direcpc.com ([198.77.116.30]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:17:06 -0500 Received: from hostname ([206.71.103.195]) by postoffice2.direcpc.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-45425U50000L50000S0) with SMTP id AAA29617 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 02:29:05 -0500 Message-ID: <004e01c0698c$55a6b320$4968140a@direcpc.com> From: "Fred Moreno" To: "Lancair List" Subject: Static Wicks Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:21:37 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I can confirm Brent's experience without static wicks. While trying to set a San Francisco to Denver speed record, we entered some light clouds at 27,000 feet. Not only did the radios check out, but the digital clock on the panel flashed a couple of times, then reset to zero, and started counting up again. It was very entertaining. So when he said "order of magnitude improvement" with wicks, he wasn't kidding. I installed the Bill Maddox kit with 15 wicks, and discussed the basis of wick number and location with Dayton-Granger, the wick manufacturer. They use an empirical formula that includes the air speed and the surface area of the airplane that can intercept the droplets or ice crystals that are carried into contact with the air frame by the air stream. Generally the largest area intercepting the ice crystals consists of the front half of the wings and the front portion of the fuselage , vertical stabilizer, and horizontal stabilizer (essentially what you can see if you stand directly in front of the airplane at a large distance). On the Lancair IV, even though the airframe is carbon, the engine cowl is fiberglas (in most cases) and failure to manage static build up on the cowl can cause problems. Also, the wings must be electrically grounded to the fuselage (the fiberglass fairings are great insulators as is the spar), as must be the horizontal stabilizer. The vertical stabilizer is non-conductive and also presents a challenge. The Lancair IV rudder is fiberglas, yet Dayton Grainger specifies three wicks at the top of the rudder. To make them work requires adding a wire connecting them to the carbon airframe. But such a wire represents a reflector for the com antenna mounted in the vertical stabilizer. (The presence of the com antenna is the reason the vertical stabilizer and rudder were made of fiberglas in the first place). So rather than string a wire that might interfere with the antenna pattern factor, I installed the wicks on the bottom of the rudder, and strung the wire from there, distant from the antenna, and near to the carbon fuselage. Compromise, compromise, compromise. Non-conductive surfaces can be static controlled through the use of conductive epoxy primer under the finish coat of paint. Several manufacturers of air frame epoxy finishes make such primers, most commonly for use on radomes specifically for static discharge. The conductive primers bleed off the static charge to the conductive regions of the airframe for subsequent transport to the static wicks for discharge. However, the conductive primers are not conductive enough to interfere with radio frequency transmissions in the frequency bands of choice (HF, VHF, and UHF including airborne radar and transponder frequencies). I have concluded that the prudent approach thus consists of the following: 1) Paint all non-conductive substrates (particularly engine cowl on Lancair IV, and wings on an ES) with conductive epoxy primer. Cover this with a primer system compatible with your finish coating system. The charge can "seep" through the finish coat to the primer to be carried away much as it seeps through to the aluminum skin of a metal airplane. 2) Make sure that all conductive structures (carbon wings and fuselage for example) are electrically connected (grounded) to each other, and verify with an ohm meter. 3) Mount the recommended number of static wicks. More is better, so it is a question of aesthetics and money. Eight works for Brent. Dayton Grainger recommends 15, but their recommendation is surely based on some testing in truly ugly conditions. Make sure the static wicks are electrically connected to the airframe ground with a separate wire. Don't count on controls, hinges, etc. to do the job as these may or may not be good electrical pathways. 4) And always stay a long, long way away from thunderstorms. Lightning and composite airplanes are not a good combination. Fred Moreno >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>