Return-Path: Received: from web117.yahoomail.com ([205.180.60.91]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:31:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 9870 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Dec 2000 17:39:47 -0000 Received: from [192.216.198.77] by web117.yahoomail.com; Fri, 08 Dec 2000 09:39:46 PST Message-ID: <20001208173947.9869.qmail@web117.yahoomail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:39:46 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Matusch Subject: header tanks and sight gages To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> It seems to me the whole concept of header tanks and sight gages that may be subject to breaking or cracking are an extreme danger in a hot plane such as the lancair. The worst case would be a leaking or broken sight gage while in flight. The gage would be leaking fuel into the cockpit. Possibly on the pilot or passenger directly. If the sight glass was entirely compromised the loss of fuel would drain the header tank and force a emergency landing. That would not be the time to land off field in a hot plane with gas in the cockpit. I still can see no reason for the header tank. The only two reasons I have found are: 1. It is a comfort knowing that a few gallons of fuel remain. ie the sight gage looking back at me. This would be true if it were a separate tank that could be switched to after the main goes dry. But the system employed with most lancairs is to make the header in series with the main. This means on most flights you run the risk of running out of fuel several times per flight. There have been several systems make to automate the filling of the header tank. The kiss principle should be applied. adding added pumps/float gages and automated switching equipment surly can't make the system more reliable. As a reading assignment check out; http://www.avweb.com/articles/pelperch/pelp0007.html 2. Aerobatics are better done with dry main tanks and the fuel on the center line of the aircraft. This is true but it is not the main reason lancairs are popular. The Glassair's used a header tank but it was usually a separate tank used only when the range need it or if the person was doing aerobatics. It usually was was a separate tank. They would switch between the main or header. I'll get off my soap box and let other minds add or tear up my arguments. Good flying >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>