Return-Path: Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.34]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 03:07:34 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.34.) id k.94.cef9d70 (4220) for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 03:15:22 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <94.cef9d70.275cac9a@aol.com> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 03:15:22 EST Subject: Re: Pyrex sight gauges To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 12/3/0 9:49:18 PM, David Jones wrote: <> David - I admit that I am not a chemist. However, I worked in a chem lab for a couple of years with several chemists, and was very impressed by their knowledge, so rest assured that I do listen to chemists. I'd like to know the basis for your objection to pyrex tubing for a sight gauge. Is it a chemical compatibility issue or the fact that, basically being glass, it is possible to fracture? We're talking about a short stubby section here, though I'll admit, a glass line doesn't seem like the best idea I've ever had... Concerning tygon, there are fuel-compatible tygons and fuel-incompatible tygons. Hey, I'm an engineer, not a chemist. If the label says "designed for petroleum-based products such as gasoline", as does Tygon F-4040, then why not use it? There's no doubt that running fuel lines through the cockpit is dangerous. A little hard to avoid, though. So having the safest fuel lines possible is the goal. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>